<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom Holland &#187; paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomholland.org.uk/tag/paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomholland.org.uk</link>
	<description>Contours of Pauline Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: The Paul Page (Mark Mattison)</title>
		<link>http://www.tomholland.org.uk/2008/02/review-the-paul-page-mark-mattison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomholland.org.uk/2008/02/review-the-paul-page-mark-mattison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Full Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomholland.org.uk/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contours of Pauline Theology A Radical New Survey of the Influences on Paul’s Biblical Writings Book Review Tom Holland, Scotland, UK: Mentor, 2004, 392 pp. Generally speaking, conservative Reformed criticisms of the new perspective on Paul strike me as lackluster and predictable. That cannot be said, however, of Tom Holland’s new book, which is bound [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomholland.org.uk/2008/02/review-the-paul-page-mark-mattison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prepublication reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.tomholland.org.uk/2008/02/prepublication-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomholland.org.uk/2008/02/prepublication-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomholland.org.uk/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is refreshing to read something radically new in such a popular area as Pauline studies. So often what promised new perspectives, new insights, turns out not to be essentially different. Tom Holland&#8217;s original and creative approach to Paul does not fall into this category.Here Paul is not the innovator of Christian doctrine- he received [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomholland.org.uk/2008/02/prepublication-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
